 | It's that time again and Charlie Sheen is pushing for a new investigation into the official 911 story. Should we re-open this case or just let it go? Why do these "truthers" keep pushing for new investigations? Is there any grounds for such an investigation? |
The "truthers", as the media has labeled them, have made another attempt to re-open the investigation into the official story. Do the "truthers" have any valid arguments? Why the ad hominem attacks against Charlie Sheen and others while ignoring the points raised?
Don't kill the messenger
I am not a "truther" but I can recognize a blatant logical fallacy when I see one. When someone ignores/denies the questions raised by Charlie Sheen because "he sleeps with prostitutes", I question their logical process. In fact, this line of reasoning is so ludicrous I can't believe John McCains daughter would even say this publicly.
For instance: What does Charlie Sheen's old personal habits have to do with the fact that members of the official 9/11 Commission do not believe the official story either!
In fact, many highly educated engineers, architects and other officials (local and Federal) have come forward to voice their suspicion that the official story isn't all there is to it.
Let's be clear here
When stories like this make news the buzz moves quickly. I for one am not a big fan of jumping on the bandwagon and parroting the first thing I hear. In this maze of information (and disinformation) it is important to ignore the commentary and stick with the facts. At present I can not say that it looks as if 9/11 was "an inside job", but some very good questions have been raised. The media and governmental officials seem inclined to perpetually ignore these questions, and as far as I am concerned this just begs the question. Why avoid the questions and attack the man? This is generally a clear sign that all may not be what it seems.
Do your own research and don't let others do your thinking for you!
Sometimes it's hard to know what to believe. I like the old saying, "Believe none of what you hear and half of what you see." This has served me well over the years so I don't hesitate to repeat it. If 9/11 is a topic of interest to you or you are simply wondering what all the buzz is about then look into it for yourself and make your own decisions.
- Read Charlie Sheen's 20 minutes with the president
- Watch an interesting documentary/movie on 9/11 below
If you can refute any of the questions raised by Sheen and others then I would be quite interested in hearing it. I am no expert but the collapse of the buildings did look as if it was done by a controlled demolition. I am also, quite interested in how the towers fell at free fall speeds. If you aren't quite sure what I am referring to then you should look into Galileo's law of falling bodies.
I personally wouldn't think that these questions entitle one to go around and point fingers at others (without any proof), but they are valid questions that deserve more consideration.
Bible 
0 comments:
Post a Comment